Quiz-summary
0 of 10 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
Information
Premium Practice Questions
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 10 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
Unlock Your Full Report
You missed {missed_count} questions. Enter your email to see exactly which ones you got wrong and read the detailed explanations.
Submit to instantly unlock detailed explanations for every question.
Success! Your results are now unlocked. You can see the correct answers and detailed explanations below.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 10
1. Question
An incident ticket at a private bank is raised about Safety Harnesses and Lanyards during risk appetite review. The report states that during a semi-annual facility maintenance audit of the bank’s high-rise headquarters, several external contractors were observed using personal fall arrest systems (PFAS) that had not been inspected by a competent person within the last 12 months. The bank’s current OHSMS policy requires strict adherence to CSA Z259 standards for all work at heights. As the Safety Professional, you are tasked with evaluating the risk and determining the most appropriate control measure to align with the bank’s low-risk appetite for life-safety incidents. What is the most effective action to ensure the integrity of the fall protection equipment and compliance with the OHSMS?
Correct
Correct: Implementing a mandatory tagging system and a centralized registry is a proactive administrative control that directly addresses the failure in the inspection cycle. By verifying competent person certifications and inspection dates before work begins, the organization ensures that the equipment meets the safety requirements of CSA Z259 and the bank’s OHSMS, effectively managing the risk of equipment failure.
Incorrect: Increasing spot checks by security personnel focuses on behavioral compliance rather than the technical integrity of the equipment. Requiring liability waivers is a risk transfer strategy that does not mitigate the actual physical hazard or fulfill the employer’s duty of care under OHS regulations. Replacing contractor equipment with bank-owned gear is often impractical, shifts the maintenance liability entirely to the bank without necessarily improving the inspection process, and does not address the underlying management system failure.
Takeaway: A robust OHSMS requires systematic verification and documentation of equipment inspections to ensure that fall protection systems remain reliable and compliant with safety standards.
Incorrect
Correct: Implementing a mandatory tagging system and a centralized registry is a proactive administrative control that directly addresses the failure in the inspection cycle. By verifying competent person certifications and inspection dates before work begins, the organization ensures that the equipment meets the safety requirements of CSA Z259 and the bank’s OHSMS, effectively managing the risk of equipment failure.
Incorrect: Increasing spot checks by security personnel focuses on behavioral compliance rather than the technical integrity of the equipment. Requiring liability waivers is a risk transfer strategy that does not mitigate the actual physical hazard or fulfill the employer’s duty of care under OHS regulations. Replacing contractor equipment with bank-owned gear is often impractical, shifts the maintenance liability entirely to the bank without necessarily improving the inspection process, and does not address the underlying management system failure.
Takeaway: A robust OHSMS requires systematic verification and documentation of equipment inspections to ensure that fall protection systems remain reliable and compliant with safety standards.
-
Question 2 of 10
2. Question
During a periodic assessment of Labeling Requirements as part of client suitability at a credit union, auditors observed that several secondary containers used for industrial-strength disinfectants in the facility maintenance department lacked workplace labels. The facility manager stated that because the maintenance staff has an average tenure of 12 years and the chemicals are kept in a locked cabinet, the risk of accidental exposure is negligible. According to the Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Control (HIRAC) framework and WHMIS standards, which action should the auditor recommend to address this non-conformity?
Correct
Correct: Under WHMIS 2015 (GHS) and standard OHSMS protocols, any hazardous product decanted into a secondary container that is not used immediately by the person who decanted it must have a workplace label. This label must include the product identifier (name), information for safe handling (precautionary measures), and a statement that an SDS is available. This is a mandatory administrative control that cannot be bypassed by worker experience or restricted access.
Incorrect: Updating the risk matrix to ignore a regulatory requirement based on seniority is a failure of the HIRAC process as it does not mitigate the hazard for new employees or emergency responders. Posting a master index is a helpful supplement but does not meet the legal requirement for individual container labeling. Labeling with only the name and date is insufficient under GHS standards, which require specific safety information and SDS references on workplace labels.
Takeaway: Workplace labels on secondary containers are a mandatory administrative control in an OHSMS and must provide specific safety information regardless of worker familiarity or restricted access.
Incorrect
Correct: Under WHMIS 2015 (GHS) and standard OHSMS protocols, any hazardous product decanted into a secondary container that is not used immediately by the person who decanted it must have a workplace label. This label must include the product identifier (name), information for safe handling (precautionary measures), and a statement that an SDS is available. This is a mandatory administrative control that cannot be bypassed by worker experience or restricted access.
Incorrect: Updating the risk matrix to ignore a regulatory requirement based on seniority is a failure of the HIRAC process as it does not mitigate the hazard for new employees or emergency responders. Posting a master index is a helpful supplement but does not meet the legal requirement for individual container labeling. Labeling with only the name and date is insufficient under GHS standards, which require specific safety information and SDS references on workplace labels.
Takeaway: Workplace labels on secondary containers are a mandatory administrative control in an OHSMS and must provide specific safety information regardless of worker familiarity or restricted access.
-
Question 3 of 10
3. Question
A procedure review at a payment services provider has identified gaps in Personal Fall Arrest Systems (PFAS) as part of gifts and entertainment. The review highlights that specialized safety harnesses used by HVAC contractors were improperly categorized in the financial system, leading to their exclusion from the mandatory safety equipment registry for 16 months. While the harnesses are currently in use, the internal audit reveals there is no documentation of periodic inspections by a competent person, nor is there a documented procedure for worker retrieval in the event of a fall. To address these deficiencies and ensure alignment with safety standards, which of the following should be the primary recommendation?
Correct
Correct: In a Personal Fall Arrest System (PFAS), regulatory compliance and worker safety depend on two critical pillars: equipment integrity and emergency response. Safety standards (such as CSA Z259 in Canada) require that PFAS equipment be inspected by a competent person at least annually and that a written rescue plan be in place. A rescue plan is vital because a worker suspended in a harness is at immediate risk of suspension trauma, which can lead to orthostatic intolerance and death if not addressed rapidly.
Incorrect: While revising procurement policies addresses the administrative root cause of how the equipment was misclassified, it does not resolve the immediate life-safety risks of uninspected gear or the lack of rescue protocols. Transitioning to fall restraint is a valid application of the hierarchy of controls, but it is not always technically feasible for all tasks and does not rectify the non-compliance of the existing PFAS. Increasing audit frequency is a monitoring control that identifies problems but does not implement the specific safety measures required by occupational health and safety regulations.
Takeaway: A valid PFAS program must include documented inspections by a competent person and a site-specific rescue plan to mitigate the risk of suspension trauma.
Incorrect
Correct: In a Personal Fall Arrest System (PFAS), regulatory compliance and worker safety depend on two critical pillars: equipment integrity and emergency response. Safety standards (such as CSA Z259 in Canada) require that PFAS equipment be inspected by a competent person at least annually and that a written rescue plan be in place. A rescue plan is vital because a worker suspended in a harness is at immediate risk of suspension trauma, which can lead to orthostatic intolerance and death if not addressed rapidly.
Incorrect: While revising procurement policies addresses the administrative root cause of how the equipment was misclassified, it does not resolve the immediate life-safety risks of uninspected gear or the lack of rescue protocols. Transitioning to fall restraint is a valid application of the hierarchy of controls, but it is not always technically feasible for all tasks and does not rectify the non-compliance of the existing PFAS. Increasing audit frequency is a monitoring control that identifies problems but does not implement the specific safety measures required by occupational health and safety regulations.
Takeaway: A valid PFAS program must include documented inspections by a competent person and a site-specific rescue plan to mitigate the risk of suspension trauma.
-
Question 4 of 10
4. Question
An escalation from the front office at a private bank concerns Welding, Cutting, and Brazing Safety during model risk. The team reports that a maintenance contractor is performing structural repairs involving oxy-fuel cutting and arc welding near the bank’s primary data center air intake. The project is scheduled for a 48-hour window, and there are concerns regarding both fire hazards and the potential for toxic fumes to enter the building’s ventilation system. Which action is most critical for the safety professional to verify before the hot work permit is authorized?
Correct
Correct: In accordance with CSA W117.2 (Safety in welding, cutting, and allied processes) and standard hot work practices, a fire watch is essential for a duration (typically 30 to 60 minutes) after work ends to detect smoldering fires. Additionally, protecting the building’s indoor air quality by isolating or filtering HVAC intakes is a critical engineering control to prevent the distribution of hazardous welding fumes, such as manganese or hexavalent chromium, to the bank’s occupants.
Incorrect: Using a Shade 5 lens for arc welding is insufficient and would lead to ocular damage; arc welding typically requires Shade 10 to 14. While Safety Data Sheets (SDS) are necessary, ‘generic’ versions are insufficient for specific alloy risks, and fire extinguishers should generally be within 35 feet (10.7 meters) of hot work, not 50 feet. A combustible gas indicator (CGI) is primarily used to detect explosive atmospheres (LEL), not oxygen levels, and is less critical in an open-air environment compared to fire surveillance and fume mitigation.
Takeaway: Effective hot work management requires a combination of post-task fire surveillance and proactive engineering controls to protect building occupants from both fire and toxic fume exposure.
Incorrect
Correct: In accordance with CSA W117.2 (Safety in welding, cutting, and allied processes) and standard hot work practices, a fire watch is essential for a duration (typically 30 to 60 minutes) after work ends to detect smoldering fires. Additionally, protecting the building’s indoor air quality by isolating or filtering HVAC intakes is a critical engineering control to prevent the distribution of hazardous welding fumes, such as manganese or hexavalent chromium, to the bank’s occupants.
Incorrect: Using a Shade 5 lens for arc welding is insufficient and would lead to ocular damage; arc welding typically requires Shade 10 to 14. While Safety Data Sheets (SDS) are necessary, ‘generic’ versions are insufficient for specific alloy risks, and fire extinguishers should generally be within 35 feet (10.7 meters) of hot work, not 50 feet. A combustible gas indicator (CGI) is primarily used to detect explosive atmospheres (LEL), not oxygen levels, and is less critical in an open-air environment compared to fire surveillance and fume mitigation.
Takeaway: Effective hot work management requires a combination of post-task fire surveillance and proactive engineering controls to protect building occupants from both fire and toxic fume exposure.
-
Question 5 of 10
5. Question
The relationship manager at a listed company is tasked with addressing Safety in the Hospitality Sector during record-keeping. After reviewing a board risk appetite review pack, the key concern is that the housekeeping and kitchen departments have seen a 15% increase in lost-time injuries over the last fiscal quarter, primarily due to ergonomic strains and slips. To align the Occupational Health and Safety Management System (OHSMS) with the board’s requirement for proactive risk reduction and continuous improvement, which action should be prioritized?
Correct
Correct: A participatory Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) involves the workers who are most familiar with the tasks, ensuring that subtle hazards are identified. By following this with engineering controls, the organization adheres to the Hierarchy of Controls, which prioritizes physical changes to the environment or equipment over less effective methods like administrative rules or PPE. This approach directly addresses the root causes of ergonomic strains and slips, fulfilling the OHSMS requirement for continuous improvement and proactive risk management.
Incorrect: Focusing solely on PPE and audits is less effective because PPE is the lowest level of the hierarchy of controls and does not eliminate the hazard. Increasing disciplinary measures for reporting failures often leads to under-reporting and a poor safety culture rather than addressing the underlying risks. While insurance mitigates financial loss, it is a risk transfer strategy that does not improve the safety of the work environment or reduce the actual occurrence of injuries, which is the primary goal of an OHSMS.
Takeaway: Effective OHSMS improvement relies on engaging workers in hazard identification and prioritizing engineering controls over administrative or protective measures.
Incorrect
Correct: A participatory Job Hazard Analysis (JHA) involves the workers who are most familiar with the tasks, ensuring that subtle hazards are identified. By following this with engineering controls, the organization adheres to the Hierarchy of Controls, which prioritizes physical changes to the environment or equipment over less effective methods like administrative rules or PPE. This approach directly addresses the root causes of ergonomic strains and slips, fulfilling the OHSMS requirement for continuous improvement and proactive risk management.
Incorrect: Focusing solely on PPE and audits is less effective because PPE is the lowest level of the hierarchy of controls and does not eliminate the hazard. Increasing disciplinary measures for reporting failures often leads to under-reporting and a poor safety culture rather than addressing the underlying risks. While insurance mitigates financial loss, it is a risk transfer strategy that does not improve the safety of the work environment or reduce the actual occurrence of injuries, which is the primary goal of an OHSMS.
Takeaway: Effective OHSMS improvement relies on engaging workers in hazard identification and prioritizing engineering controls over administrative or protective measures.
-
Question 6 of 10
6. Question
Which preventive measure is most critical when handling Air Quality Monitoring and Control in a facility where a new solvent-based cleaning process has been introduced, potentially exposing workers to volatile organic compounds (VOCs)?
Correct
Correct: In the hierarchy of controls, engineering controls such as local exhaust ventilation (LEV) are prioritized because they remove the hazard at the source. By capturing VOCs before they reach the worker’s breathing zone, the risk of inhalation is significantly reduced at a systemic level, which is more effective and reliable than relying on administrative measures or personal protective equipment.
Incorrect: Monitoring strategies like area sampling and dosimetry are essential for performance measurement and verification of compliance, but they are reactive and do not actively prevent exposure. Mandating respirators is a lower-tier control in the hierarchy and should only be used when engineering controls are not feasible or as a temporary measure, as it relies on individual compliance and proper fit. General dilution ventilation is less effective than source capture because it allows the contaminant to disperse throughout the workspace, potentially exposing a larger number of employees to lower concentrations rather than eliminating the exposure at the point of origin.
Takeaway: Engineering controls that capture air contaminants at the source are the most effective preventive measure in the hierarchy of controls for managing air quality.
Incorrect
Correct: In the hierarchy of controls, engineering controls such as local exhaust ventilation (LEV) are prioritized because they remove the hazard at the source. By capturing VOCs before they reach the worker’s breathing zone, the risk of inhalation is significantly reduced at a systemic level, which is more effective and reliable than relying on administrative measures or personal protective equipment.
Incorrect: Monitoring strategies like area sampling and dosimetry are essential for performance measurement and verification of compliance, but they are reactive and do not actively prevent exposure. Mandating respirators is a lower-tier control in the hierarchy and should only be used when engineering controls are not feasible or as a temporary measure, as it relies on individual compliance and proper fit. General dilution ventilation is less effective than source capture because it allows the contaminant to disperse throughout the workspace, potentially exposing a larger number of employees to lower concentrations rather than eliminating the exposure at the point of origin.
Takeaway: Engineering controls that capture air contaminants at the source are the most effective preventive measure in the hierarchy of controls for managing air quality.
-
Question 7 of 10
7. Question
A new business initiative at a fintech lender requires guidance on Audit Planning and Execution as part of internal audit remediation. The proposal raises questions about the integration of a new automated facility management system within their urban headquarters. The Chief Safety Officer is preparing for a third-party ISO 45001 certification audit scheduled for the next quarter. During the internal audit phase, it is discovered that while the Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Control (HIRAC) process is documented, the actual implementation of controls for the new high-voltage server rooms has not been verified against the 2023 safety manual updates. Which of the following actions should the internal auditor prioritize to ensure the audit execution phase effectively validates the operational control of the high-voltage server rooms?
Correct
Correct: In the context of OHSMS auditing, the most reliable evidence for operational control is obtained through a combination of observation and interviews. Observing the lockout/tagout (LOTO) procedures provides direct evidence of the control’s application, while interviews verify that the personnel are competent and understand the specific requirements of the 2023 safety manual updates, ensuring the ‘Check’ phase of the PDCA cycle is robust.
Incorrect: Reviewing digital logs is a form of document review that confirms task completion but does not verify if safety protocols were followed during those tasks. Requesting a signed attestation is a weak form of testimonial evidence that does not prove actual compliance or understanding. Comparing previous audit findings is a retrospective administrative exercise that fails to validate the current operational effectiveness of new controls in the high-voltage environment.
Takeaway: Effective OHSMS audit execution requires the triangulation of evidence through document review, physical observation, and personnel interviews to confirm that controls are both implemented and understood.
Incorrect
Correct: In the context of OHSMS auditing, the most reliable evidence for operational control is obtained through a combination of observation and interviews. Observing the lockout/tagout (LOTO) procedures provides direct evidence of the control’s application, while interviews verify that the personnel are competent and understand the specific requirements of the 2023 safety manual updates, ensuring the ‘Check’ phase of the PDCA cycle is robust.
Incorrect: Reviewing digital logs is a form of document review that confirms task completion but does not verify if safety protocols were followed during those tasks. Requesting a signed attestation is a weak form of testimonial evidence that does not prove actual compliance or understanding. Comparing previous audit findings is a retrospective administrative exercise that fails to validate the current operational effectiveness of new controls in the high-voltage environment.
Takeaway: Effective OHSMS audit execution requires the triangulation of evidence through document review, physical observation, and personnel interviews to confirm that controls are both implemented and understood.
-
Question 8 of 10
8. Question
The risk committee at a private bank is debating standards for Mine Rescue and Emergency Response as part of incident response. The central issue is that the bank recently acquired a mineral exploration subsidiary and must now integrate specialized underground safety protocols into its overarching Occupational Health and Safety Management System (OHSMS). During an initial audit of the subsidiary, it was discovered that the mine rescue team (MRT) has not conducted a live underground drill in over eight months, and training records show only sporadic classroom-based sessions. To align with Canadian provincial mining regulations and industry best practices, which of the following actions should the safety professional prioritize to ensure the emergency response capability is robust?
Correct
Correct: In the high-risk environment of underground mining, mine rescue teams must maintain a high level of physical and technical proficiency. Monthly hands-on training is a standard industry expectation to ensure skills remain sharp for low-frequency, high-consequence events. Furthermore, conducting a full-scale simulation at least annually is critical for testing the integration of communication, logistics, and technical rescue skills within the actual environment where they will be deployed, as required by most Canadian mining jurisdictions.
Incorrect: Quarterly theoretical training is insufficient because mine rescue requires physical mastery of complex equipment and maneuvers that cannot be sustained through classroom work alone. Relying solely on mutual aid is a significant risk and often a regulatory violation, as internal teams must be the first line of defense. Bi-annual equipment inspections, while necessary, do not address the critical deficiency in personnel competency and response coordination identified in the scenario.
Takeaway: Effective mine rescue readiness requires a combination of frequent hands-on training and regular full-scale simulations to validate both personnel competency and the overall emergency response framework.
Incorrect
Correct: In the high-risk environment of underground mining, mine rescue teams must maintain a high level of physical and technical proficiency. Monthly hands-on training is a standard industry expectation to ensure skills remain sharp for low-frequency, high-consequence events. Furthermore, conducting a full-scale simulation at least annually is critical for testing the integration of communication, logistics, and technical rescue skills within the actual environment where they will be deployed, as required by most Canadian mining jurisdictions.
Incorrect: Quarterly theoretical training is insufficient because mine rescue requires physical mastery of complex equipment and maneuvers that cannot be sustained through classroom work alone. Relying solely on mutual aid is a significant risk and often a regulatory violation, as internal teams must be the first line of defense. Bi-annual equipment inspections, while necessary, do not address the critical deficiency in personnel competency and response coordination identified in the scenario.
Takeaway: Effective mine rescue readiness requires a combination of frequent hands-on training and regular full-scale simulations to validate both personnel competency and the overall emergency response framework.
-
Question 9 of 10
9. Question
Which characterization of Safety Data Sheets (SDS) is most accurate for Canadian Registered Safety Professional (CRSP) regarding their role within a comprehensive Occupational Health and Safety Management System (OHSMS)?
Correct
Correct: In the context of a Canadian OHSMS, the SDS is a foundational element of the Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Control (HIRAC) process. Under WHMIS 2015 (GHS alignment), the CRSP must ensure that SDSs are not only present but are the most current versions available from the supplier. They provide the technical basis for developing safe work procedures and selecting appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).
Incorrect: The suggestion that filing documents in a registry fulfills the duty to inform is incorrect because WHMIS regulations require SDSs to be readily accessible to workers in their work areas. The claim that an SDS replaces a site-specific JHA is incorrect because an SDS provides product-specific data, whereas a JHA evaluates the interaction between the product, the specific task, the environment, and the worker. The statement regarding the 16-section format being optional is false; the 16-section GHS format is a mandatory requirement under WHMIS 2015 for all suppliers and manufacturers.
Takeaway: Safety Data Sheets are dynamic technical tools essential for risk assessment and must be kept current and readily accessible to all workers to maintain a compliant OHSMS.
Incorrect
Correct: In the context of a Canadian OHSMS, the SDS is a foundational element of the Hazard Identification, Risk Assessment, and Control (HIRAC) process. Under WHMIS 2015 (GHS alignment), the CRSP must ensure that SDSs are not only present but are the most current versions available from the supplier. They provide the technical basis for developing safe work procedures and selecting appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE).
Incorrect: The suggestion that filing documents in a registry fulfills the duty to inform is incorrect because WHMIS regulations require SDSs to be readily accessible to workers in their work areas. The claim that an SDS replaces a site-specific JHA is incorrect because an SDS provides product-specific data, whereas a JHA evaluates the interaction between the product, the specific task, the environment, and the worker. The statement regarding the 16-section format being optional is false; the 16-section GHS format is a mandatory requirement under WHMIS 2015 for all suppliers and manufacturers.
Takeaway: Safety Data Sheets are dynamic technical tools essential for risk assessment and must be kept current and readily accessible to all workers to maintain a compliant OHSMS.
-
Question 10 of 10
10. Question
Which consideration is most important when selecting an approach to Welding, Cutting, and Brazing Safety? A safety professional is auditing a facility’s hot work program where maintenance welding is frequently performed in proximity to flammable production byproducts. When determining the most effective risk mitigation strategy for these high-risk activities, which factor should be given the highest priority according to the hierarchy of controls?
Correct
Correct: According to the hierarchy of controls, the most effective way to manage risk is to eliminate the hazard or isolate the worker from it. Relocating the welding task to a designated, controlled environment (a permanent welding shop) effectively removes the ignition source from the hazardous area containing flammable byproducts. This is a higher-level control than administrative procedures or personal protective equipment.
Incorrect: Implementing a hot work permit and fire watch are administrative controls which, while necessary for in situ work, rely on human behavior and are lower on the hierarchy of controls. Using flame-resistant blankets is an engineering/isolation control, but it is less effective than moving the work to a safe zone entirely. Selecting respiratory protection is the least effective control as it is PPE and only protects the individual wearer without addressing the fire or explosion risk to the facility.
Takeaway: The highest priority in welding safety is to apply the hierarchy of controls by attempting to move the work to a designated safe area before relying on administrative permits or PPE.
Incorrect
Correct: According to the hierarchy of controls, the most effective way to manage risk is to eliminate the hazard or isolate the worker from it. Relocating the welding task to a designated, controlled environment (a permanent welding shop) effectively removes the ignition source from the hazardous area containing flammable byproducts. This is a higher-level control than administrative procedures or personal protective equipment.
Incorrect: Implementing a hot work permit and fire watch are administrative controls which, while necessary for in situ work, rely on human behavior and are lower on the hierarchy of controls. Using flame-resistant blankets is an engineering/isolation control, but it is less effective than moving the work to a safe zone entirely. Selecting respiratory protection is the least effective control as it is PPE and only protects the individual wearer without addressing the fire or explosion risk to the facility.
Takeaway: The highest priority in welding safety is to apply the hierarchy of controls by attempting to move the work to a designated safe area before relying on administrative permits or PPE.