Quiz-summary
0 of 10 questions completed
Questions:
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
Information
Premium Practice Questions
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading...
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You have to finish following quiz, to start this quiz:
Results
0 of 10 questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
Unlock Your Full Report
You missed {missed_count} questions. Enter your email to see exactly which ones you got wrong and read the detailed explanations.
Submit to instantly unlock detailed explanations for every question.
Success! Your results are now unlocked. You can see the correct answers and detailed explanations below.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- Answered
- Review
-
Question 1 of 10
1. Question
Which description best captures the essence of Training Requirements for Electrical Workers for NFPA 70E Electrical Safety in the Workplace Certification (NFPA 70E)? During a periodic audit of a corporate electrical safety program, an internal auditor evaluates the training records of the maintenance department to determine if the facility meets the requirements for qualified persons. To comply with the standard, the auditor must verify that the training program adheres to which of the following criteria?
Correct
Correct: According to NFPA 70E Article 110.2, training for electrical workers must be classroom-based, on-the-job, or a combination of both. It must ensure that employees are able to identify and understand the hazards associated with their work. Furthermore, the standard explicitly requires that retraining be performed at intervals not to exceed three years, or sooner if there are changes in the workplace, equipment, or if the employee is not following safe work practices.
Incorrect: The requirement for a master electrician license is a state licensing issue and does not define a qualified person under NFPA 70E, which focuses on specific task-based safety training. While retraining is required after safety violations or equipment changes, the standard also mandates a maximum three-year interval regardless of performance. Finally, NFPA 70E requires that all training, including the content and the names of the employees, be documented throughout the duration of employment.
Takeaway: NFPA 70E requires documented training that enables hazard recognition, with mandatory retraining at least every three years or upon significant changes in the work environment.
Incorrect
Correct: According to NFPA 70E Article 110.2, training for electrical workers must be classroom-based, on-the-job, or a combination of both. It must ensure that employees are able to identify and understand the hazards associated with their work. Furthermore, the standard explicitly requires that retraining be performed at intervals not to exceed three years, or sooner if there are changes in the workplace, equipment, or if the employee is not following safe work practices.
Incorrect: The requirement for a master electrician license is a state licensing issue and does not define a qualified person under NFPA 70E, which focuses on specific task-based safety training. While retraining is required after safety violations or equipment changes, the standard also mandates a maximum three-year interval regardless of performance. Finally, NFPA 70E requires that all training, including the content and the names of the employees, be documented throughout the duration of employment.
Takeaway: NFPA 70E requires documented training that enables hazard recognition, with mandatory retraining at least every three years or upon significant changes in the work environment.
-
Question 2 of 10
2. Question
Which approach is most appropriate when applying Grounding and Bonding for Shock Prevention in a real-world setting? During an audit of a facility’s electrical safety program, an internal auditor evaluates the procedures used by maintenance staff to establish an electrically safe work condition on a 13.8kV distribution transformer. The auditor is specifically reviewing the sequence of operations and the specifications for the equipment used to prevent shock from induced voltages or accidental re-energization.
Correct
Correct: According to NFPA 70E Article 120.5, the process for establishing an electrically safe work condition requires that the absence of voltage be verified before any grounding equipment is applied. Furthermore, temporary protective grounding equipment must be rated for the maximum available fault current and the duration of the fault to ensure it can safely clear a fault without failing or creating additional hazards.
Incorrect: Applying grounding cables before verifying the absence of voltage is a critical safety violation that could result in an arc flash if the system is still energized. Relying solely on the permanent equipment grounding conductor is insufficient for temporary protective grounding, as it may not be rated for the specific fault currents or accessible at the point of work. Bonding to building steel is a permanent safety feature but does not replace the requirement for temporary grounding to protect workers from induced voltages or accidental re-energization during maintenance.
Takeaway: Temporary protective grounding must only be applied after verifying the absence of voltage and must be specifically rated for the system’s available fault current.
Incorrect
Correct: According to NFPA 70E Article 120.5, the process for establishing an electrically safe work condition requires that the absence of voltage be verified before any grounding equipment is applied. Furthermore, temporary protective grounding equipment must be rated for the maximum available fault current and the duration of the fault to ensure it can safely clear a fault without failing or creating additional hazards.
Incorrect: Applying grounding cables before verifying the absence of voltage is a critical safety violation that could result in an arc flash if the system is still energized. Relying solely on the permanent equipment grounding conductor is insufficient for temporary protective grounding, as it may not be rated for the specific fault currents or accessible at the point of work. Bonding to building steel is a permanent safety feature but does not replace the requirement for temporary grounding to protect workers from induced voltages or accidental re-energization during maintenance.
Takeaway: Temporary protective grounding must only be applied after verifying the absence of voltage and must be specifically rated for the system’s available fault current.
-
Question 3 of 10
3. Question
Following a thematic review of Arc-Rated (AR) Clothing and Equipment as part of third-party risk, an insurer received feedback indicating that several field technicians were layering non-arc-rated synthetic garments under their issued arc-rated coveralls during winter months. During a follow-up audit of the facility’s Electrical Safety Program (ESP), the lead auditor noted that the current policy allows for personal undergarments as long as the outer layer meets the minimum arc thermal performance value (ATPV) for the calculated flash hazard. Which of the following findings represents the most significant violation of NFPA 70E standards regarding the use of these garments?
Correct
Correct: NFPA 70E 130.7(C)(9) explicitly prohibits the use of meltable synthetic materials such as acetate, nylon, polyester, polypropylene, and spandex in undergarments. This is because an arc flash generates intense thermal energy that can pass through the arc-rated outer layer; if the undergarment is meltable, it can melt onto the skin, causing severe and permanent injury, regardless of whether the outer layer was breached or ignited.
Incorrect: NFPA 70E allows the use of non-melting, flammable fibers like 100% cotton, silk, or wool as undergarments, so requiring all layers to be arc-rated is not a standard requirement. There is no specific NFPA 70E requirement for a safety factor margin beyond the rating being equal to or greater than the hazard. While daily inspections of PPE are required before each use, the standard focuses on the overall condition and cleanliness rather than a specific mandate for daily internal seam checks for thread degradation.
Takeaway: Undergarments made of meltable synthetic materials are strictly prohibited under arc-rated clothing because they can melt to the wearer’s skin during a thermal event.
Incorrect
Correct: NFPA 70E 130.7(C)(9) explicitly prohibits the use of meltable synthetic materials such as acetate, nylon, polyester, polypropylene, and spandex in undergarments. This is because an arc flash generates intense thermal energy that can pass through the arc-rated outer layer; if the undergarment is meltable, it can melt onto the skin, causing severe and permanent injury, regardless of whether the outer layer was breached or ignited.
Incorrect: NFPA 70E allows the use of non-melting, flammable fibers like 100% cotton, silk, or wool as undergarments, so requiring all layers to be arc-rated is not a standard requirement. There is no specific NFPA 70E requirement for a safety factor margin beyond the rating being equal to or greater than the hazard. While daily inspections of PPE are required before each use, the standard focuses on the overall condition and cleanliness rather than a specific mandate for daily internal seam checks for thread degradation.
Takeaway: Undergarments made of meltable synthetic materials are strictly prohibited under arc-rated clothing because they can melt to the wearer’s skin during a thermal event.
-
Question 4 of 10
4. Question
A transaction monitoring alert at a listed company has triggered regarding Electrical Safety Program Management during record-keeping. The alert details show that during an internal review of the safety management system, the auditor identified that the written Electrical Safety Program (ESP) has not undergone a documented audit since its implementation 42 months ago. The facility manager contends that the program is still effective because field work audits of employees are performed annually and no electrical injuries have been recorded in the interim. According to NFPA 70E, what is the specific deficiency in the company’s management of its Electrical Safety Program?
Correct
Correct: NFPA 70E Section 110.5(M)(1) explicitly states that the Electrical Safety Program shall be audited at intervals not to exceed 3 years. This programmatic audit is necessary to ensure that the written procedures, risk assessment processes, and safety principles align with the most recent safety standards and organizational needs.
Incorrect: The requirement for a program audit is a fixed time-based mandate and is not contingent upon changes in personnel or facility infrastructure. While field work audits are required annually under 110.5(M)(2) to verify employee compliance, they are a separate requirement from the comprehensive program audit and do not satisfy the 3-year program review. A five-year interval exceeds the maximum three-year limit established by the standard.
Takeaway: NFPA 70E mandates a comprehensive audit of the Electrical Safety Program at least every three years, independent of employee field audits or incident history.
Incorrect
Correct: NFPA 70E Section 110.5(M)(1) explicitly states that the Electrical Safety Program shall be audited at intervals not to exceed 3 years. This programmatic audit is necessary to ensure that the written procedures, risk assessment processes, and safety principles align with the most recent safety standards and organizational needs.
Incorrect: The requirement for a program audit is a fixed time-based mandate and is not contingent upon changes in personnel or facility infrastructure. While field work audits are required annually under 110.5(M)(2) to verify employee compliance, they are a separate requirement from the comprehensive program audit and do not satisfy the 3-year program review. A five-year interval exceeds the maximum three-year limit established by the standard.
Takeaway: NFPA 70E mandates a comprehensive audit of the Electrical Safety Program at least every three years, independent of employee field audits or incident history.
-
Question 5 of 10
5. Question
Which preventive measure is most critical when handling Testing and Verification of De-energized Circuits? A qualified electrical worker is preparing to perform maintenance on a 480V motor control center. The worker has successfully identified all sources of power, disconnected the equipment, and applied lockout/tagout devices. To establish an electrically safe work condition, the worker must now verify the absence of voltage at the point of work. Which specific action must be taken to ensure the integrity of the verification process?
Correct
Correct: According to NFPA 70E Article 120.5(7), the process for establishing an electrically safe work condition requires that the test instrument be verified on a known voltage source before and after the test. This ‘Live-Dead-Live’ procedure ensures that the meter is functioning correctly and has not failed during the measurement, preventing a false negative reading that could lead to accidental contact with energized parts.
Incorrect: Using non-contact proximity detectors is generally discouraged as the primary verification method because they may not detect shielded cables or DC voltage and are prone to interference. Relying on pilot lights or visual indicators is a violation of safety standards because indicators can fail or be wired incorrectly, providing a false sense of security. Testing only at the disconnect switch is insufficient because it does not account for potential backfeeds, stored energy, or downstream sources that may still be present at the actual point of work.
Takeaway: The Live-Dead-Live method is the mandatory standard for verifying that a test instrument is functioning properly when establishing an electrically safe work condition.
Incorrect
Correct: According to NFPA 70E Article 120.5(7), the process for establishing an electrically safe work condition requires that the test instrument be verified on a known voltage source before and after the test. This ‘Live-Dead-Live’ procedure ensures that the meter is functioning correctly and has not failed during the measurement, preventing a false negative reading that could lead to accidental contact with energized parts.
Incorrect: Using non-contact proximity detectors is generally discouraged as the primary verification method because they may not detect shielded cables or DC voltage and are prone to interference. Relying on pilot lights or visual indicators is a violation of safety standards because indicators can fail or be wired incorrectly, providing a false sense of security. Testing only at the disconnect switch is insufficient because it does not account for potential backfeeds, stored energy, or downstream sources that may still be present at the actual point of work.
Takeaway: The Live-Dead-Live method is the mandatory standard for verifying that a test instrument is functioning properly when establishing an electrically safe work condition.
-
Question 6 of 10
6. Question
A whistleblower report received by a credit union alleges issues with Pre-Task Planning for Electrical Safety during market conduct. The allegation claims that during a recent upgrade to the facility’s main distribution system, the job safety planning process was bypassed for tasks deemed routine by the lead electrician. As the internal auditor reviewing the credit union’s compliance with NFPA 70E standards, which of the following requirements must you verify was met regarding the job safety plan and briefing?
Correct
Correct: According to NFPA 70E Section 110.1(I), a job safety plan must be completed by a qualified person for each task and must be documented. This plan must include a description of the job, identification of electrical hazards, a risk assessment, and the work procedures involved. Additionally, a job briefing must be held before starting each job to ensure that all employees involved understand the hazards and the required safety procedures.
Incorrect: Maintaining only a verbal agreement is insufficient because NFPA 70E specifically requires the job safety plan to be documented. The claim that briefings are only for energized work is incorrect; safety planning and briefings are required for all electrical work, including de-energized tasks. Deferring documentation until the end of the project violates the requirement that the plan be completed and the briefing held before the work begins.
Takeaway: NFPA 70E mandates that every electrical task be preceded by a documented job safety plan and a job briefing to ensure all personnel are aware of hazards and risk control measures.
Incorrect
Correct: According to NFPA 70E Section 110.1(I), a job safety plan must be completed by a qualified person for each task and must be documented. This plan must include a description of the job, identification of electrical hazards, a risk assessment, and the work procedures involved. Additionally, a job briefing must be held before starting each job to ensure that all employees involved understand the hazards and the required safety procedures.
Incorrect: Maintaining only a verbal agreement is insufficient because NFPA 70E specifically requires the job safety plan to be documented. The claim that briefings are only for energized work is incorrect; safety planning and briefings are required for all electrical work, including de-energized tasks. Deferring documentation until the end of the project violates the requirement that the plan be completed and the briefing held before the work begins.
Takeaway: NFPA 70E mandates that every electrical task be preceded by a documented job safety plan and a job briefing to ensure all personnel are aware of hazards and risk control measures.
-
Question 7 of 10
7. Question
During a routine supervisory engagement with a wealth manager, the authority asks about Grounding and Bonding for Shock Prevention in the context of third-party risk. They observe that a third-party maintenance team is operating portable 480V equipment without a verified equipment grounding conductor (EGC) connected to the facility’s main grounding electrode system. The auditor identifies that the contractor is relying solely on a temporary ground rod driven into the earth. Based on NFPA 70E requirements for establishing a safe work condition and preventing shock, what is the most critical risk associated with this specific grounding configuration?
Correct
Correct: An effective ground-fault current path must be permanent, continuous, and have low impedance to facilitate the operation of the overcurrent protective device (OCPD). According to NFPA 70E and the NEC, the earth is not permitted to be used as the sole equipment grounding conductor because its resistance is too high to allow enough current to flow to trip a breaker or blow a fuse. Consequently, if a ground fault occurs, the metal frame of the equipment will remain energized at line voltage, posing a severe shock hazard to anyone who touches it.
Incorrect: The lack of a direct bond to the neutral bus (Option B) primarily affects the stability of the system voltage and the ability to clear faults, but it does not directly cause the dielectric failure of insulated tools. Arc flash incident energy (Option C) is determined by the magnitude of the fault current and the duration of the fault; while grounding affects these, there is no standard 1.5 multiplier associated with ground rods. Lockout/tagout compliance (Option D) is focused on the isolation of energy sources and the verification of a zero-energy state; while grounding is part of safety, LOTO verification is not dependent on the presence of a grounding bus for the use of proximity testers.
Takeaway: An effective ground-fault current path must have low impedance to ensure overcurrent devices trip quickly during a fault, preventing equipment enclosures from remaining energized at lethal voltages.
Incorrect
Correct: An effective ground-fault current path must be permanent, continuous, and have low impedance to facilitate the operation of the overcurrent protective device (OCPD). According to NFPA 70E and the NEC, the earth is not permitted to be used as the sole equipment grounding conductor because its resistance is too high to allow enough current to flow to trip a breaker or blow a fuse. Consequently, if a ground fault occurs, the metal frame of the equipment will remain energized at line voltage, posing a severe shock hazard to anyone who touches it.
Incorrect: The lack of a direct bond to the neutral bus (Option B) primarily affects the stability of the system voltage and the ability to clear faults, but it does not directly cause the dielectric failure of insulated tools. Arc flash incident energy (Option C) is determined by the magnitude of the fault current and the duration of the fault; while grounding affects these, there is no standard 1.5 multiplier associated with ground rods. Lockout/tagout compliance (Option D) is focused on the isolation of energy sources and the verification of a zero-energy state; while grounding is part of safety, LOTO verification is not dependent on the presence of a grounding bus for the use of proximity testers.
Takeaway: An effective ground-fault current path must have low impedance to ensure overcurrent devices trip quickly during a fault, preventing equipment enclosures from remaining energized at lethal voltages.
-
Question 8 of 10
8. Question
During a periodic assessment of Electrical Safety in Explosive Atmospheres as part of client suitability at a private bank, auditors observed that the facility management team at a high-security data center recently updated their backup generator fuel storage area. The area is classified as a Class I, Division 1 location. During the audit, it was noted that a maintenance contractor performed a diagnostic test on a sensor using a standard digital multimeter that was not specifically rated as intrinsically safe for the environment. The work was conducted under a general maintenance permit issued 48 hours prior, but without a specific energized electrical work permit or documented atmospheric monitoring. Which of the following findings represents the most significant violation of NFPA 70E standards regarding risk assessment and work practices in this hazardous location?
Correct
Correct: According to NFPA 70E, when working in hazardous (classified) locations, electrical equipment and tools must be specifically rated for the environment (e.g., intrinsically safe). If non-rated equipment is used, the risk assessment must ensure the atmosphere is made non-hazardous through ventilation and confirmed via continuous monitoring before and during the work. Using standard equipment in a Class I, Division 1 area without these specific mitigations introduces a high risk of ignition in an explosive atmosphere.
Incorrect: The failure to renew a general permit within 24 hours is an administrative oversight but does not directly address the physical ignition hazard posed by the equipment. While a safety watch is a valid precaution for many energized tasks, it does not mitigate the primary hazard of using non-rated electrical tools in an explosive environment. The lack of a calibration sticker is a quality control and maintenance issue rather than a specific NFPA 70E safety violation regarding hazardous location classifications.
Takeaway: In hazardous locations, the risk assessment must prioritize the elimination of ignition sources by using rated equipment or ensuring the atmosphere is rendered non-explosive through monitored engineering controls.
Incorrect
Correct: According to NFPA 70E, when working in hazardous (classified) locations, electrical equipment and tools must be specifically rated for the environment (e.g., intrinsically safe). If non-rated equipment is used, the risk assessment must ensure the atmosphere is made non-hazardous through ventilation and confirmed via continuous monitoring before and during the work. Using standard equipment in a Class I, Division 1 area without these specific mitigations introduces a high risk of ignition in an explosive atmosphere.
Incorrect: The failure to renew a general permit within 24 hours is an administrative oversight but does not directly address the physical ignition hazard posed by the equipment. While a safety watch is a valid precaution for many energized tasks, it does not mitigate the primary hazard of using non-rated electrical tools in an explosive environment. The lack of a calibration sticker is a quality control and maintenance issue rather than a specific NFPA 70E safety violation regarding hazardous location classifications.
Takeaway: In hazardous locations, the risk assessment must prioritize the elimination of ignition sources by using rated equipment or ensuring the atmosphere is rendered non-explosive through monitored engineering controls.
-
Question 9 of 10
9. Question
When a problem arises concerning Emergency Electrical Systems, what should be the immediate priority? Consider a scenario where an automatic transfer switch (ATS) fails to operate during a routine monthly test of a hospital’s emergency power supply system. A qualified electrical worker is tasked with investigating the failure while the system remains energized to maintain critical life-safety loads.
Correct
Correct: According to NFPA 70E, before any work is performed on or near energized electrical equipment, the immediate priority is to perform a risk assessment. This process involves identifying the hazards (shock and arc flash), estimating the likelihood and severity of injury, and determining the necessary protective measures, including Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and the establishment of limited and restricted approach boundaries. Even in emergency systems where uptime is critical, the safety of the personnel must be established through a formal assessment before physical interaction with the equipment occurs.
Incorrect: Manually forcing a transfer switch without a risk assessment is extremely dangerous and could trigger an arc flash event. Reviewing single-line diagrams is a secondary step for system understanding but does not address the immediate physical hazards present at the equipment. Initiating a visual inspection inside the enclosure involves entering the restricted or limited approach boundaries, which requires the worker to have already completed the risk assessment and donned the appropriate PPE.
Takeaway: The safety of the electrical worker, established through a formal risk assessment and hazard identification, must always precede troubleshooting or maintenance actions, regardless of the system’s criticality.
Incorrect
Correct: According to NFPA 70E, before any work is performed on or near energized electrical equipment, the immediate priority is to perform a risk assessment. This process involves identifying the hazards (shock and arc flash), estimating the likelihood and severity of injury, and determining the necessary protective measures, including Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) and the establishment of limited and restricted approach boundaries. Even in emergency systems where uptime is critical, the safety of the personnel must be established through a formal assessment before physical interaction with the equipment occurs.
Incorrect: Manually forcing a transfer switch without a risk assessment is extremely dangerous and could trigger an arc flash event. Reviewing single-line diagrams is a secondary step for system understanding but does not address the immediate physical hazards present at the equipment. Initiating a visual inspection inside the enclosure involves entering the restricted or limited approach boundaries, which requires the worker to have already completed the risk assessment and donned the appropriate PPE.
Takeaway: The safety of the electrical worker, established through a formal risk assessment and hazard identification, must always precede troubleshooting or maintenance actions, regardless of the system’s criticality.
-
Question 10 of 10
10. Question
Which characterization of Training Requirements for Electrical Workers is most accurate for NFPA 70E Electrical Safety in the Workplace Certification (NFPA 70E)? A large manufacturing facility is reviewing its compliance with electrical safety standards and must determine the specific mandates for retraining qualified persons and the scope of training required for unqualified personnel who work near electrical hazards.
Correct
Correct: According to NFPA 70E Section 110.2, retraining for qualified persons must be performed at intervals not to exceed three years. Furthermore, the standard requires that the employer document that each employee has received the training required, and this documentation must be made when the employee demonstrates proficiency in the work practices involved. The documentation must contain the content of the training, each employee’s name, and the dates of the training.
Incorrect: The suggestion that retraining is only mandatory upon a violation or equipment change is incorrect because NFPA 70E establishes a hard limit of three years for retraining regardless of performance. The claim that unqualified persons are exempt from training is false; unqualified persons must be trained in and be familiar with any electrical safety-related practices necessary for their safety. The idea that qualified status is maintained indefinitely through performance reviews alone contradicts the regulatory requirement for periodic formal retraining and documentation.
Takeaway: Qualified persons must receive documented retraining at least every three years to ensure continued proficiency and compliance with evolving safety standards.
Incorrect
Correct: According to NFPA 70E Section 110.2, retraining for qualified persons must be performed at intervals not to exceed three years. Furthermore, the standard requires that the employer document that each employee has received the training required, and this documentation must be made when the employee demonstrates proficiency in the work practices involved. The documentation must contain the content of the training, each employee’s name, and the dates of the training.
Incorrect: The suggestion that retraining is only mandatory upon a violation or equipment change is incorrect because NFPA 70E establishes a hard limit of three years for retraining regardless of performance. The claim that unqualified persons are exempt from training is false; unqualified persons must be trained in and be familiar with any electrical safety-related practices necessary for their safety. The idea that qualified status is maintained indefinitely through performance reviews alone contradicts the regulatory requirement for periodic formal retraining and documentation.
Takeaway: Qualified persons must receive documented retraining at least every three years to ensure continued proficiency and compliance with evolving safety standards.